THE EFFECTIVENESS GROUP
  • HOME
    • OUR PHILOSOPHY
    • ABOUT US
    • SIGN UP
    • CONTACT US
  • WHAT WE DO
    • TRAINING >
      • CONVERSITY®
      • THE MEANINGFUL LEADER®
    • PERSONALITY
    • KEYNOTE SPEAKING >
      • TOWARDS ACCEPTANCE
      • SLOW DOWN
      • MEANINGFUL LEADER
  • RESOURCES
    • INTERVIEWS
    • E-LEARNING >
      • FORM
    • ARTICLES >
      • 10 Ms OF ENGAGEMENT
      • A PERFECT MATCH
      • SEEKING COMMON GROUND
      • PERSONALITY MANUAL
      • PERSONAL SIDE OF ENGAGEMENT
      • ENGAGED TO SERVE
    • VIDEOS >
      • DECODING CHANGE
      • WHAT COULD GO WRONG
      • GLOBAL IMPACT OF YOU
      • FIT: CAREER & PERSONALITY
      • BiG FIVE INTRO
      • FORCE FIELD
      • PREDICTING ENGAGEMENT
      • ABILENE PARADOX
      • BAIRD'S ETHICAL LENSES
    • TOOLS & SURVEYS >
      • CREATIVITY AND THEMES
      • ENERGY GAME
      • BIG FIVE
      • JEOPARDY
      • ROI CALCULATOR
  • BLOG
  • HOME
    • OUR PHILOSOPHY
    • ABOUT US
    • SIGN UP
    • CONTACT US
  • WHAT WE DO
    • TRAINING >
      • CONVERSITY®
      • THE MEANINGFUL LEADER®
    • PERSONALITY
    • KEYNOTE SPEAKING >
      • TOWARDS ACCEPTANCE
      • SLOW DOWN
      • MEANINGFUL LEADER
  • RESOURCES
    • INTERVIEWS
    • E-LEARNING >
      • FORM
    • ARTICLES >
      • 10 Ms OF ENGAGEMENT
      • A PERFECT MATCH
      • SEEKING COMMON GROUND
      • PERSONALITY MANUAL
      • PERSONAL SIDE OF ENGAGEMENT
      • ENGAGED TO SERVE
    • VIDEOS >
      • DECODING CHANGE
      • WHAT COULD GO WRONG
      • GLOBAL IMPACT OF YOU
      • FIT: CAREER & PERSONALITY
      • BiG FIVE INTRO
      • FORCE FIELD
      • PREDICTING ENGAGEMENT
      • ABILENE PARADOX
      • BAIRD'S ETHICAL LENSES
    • TOOLS & SURVEYS >
      • CREATIVITY AND THEMES
      • ENERGY GAME
      • BIG FIVE
      • JEOPARDY
      • ROI CALCULATOR
  • BLOG

What's the Matter with Love - the Limits of Impartiality

4/6/2014

2 Comments

 
Lately I have dedicated considerable time and effort to a study on impartiality and ethical decision making among HR professionals.  The data for the study were collected a little while back with one of my then graduate students, Tim Kozitza.  I'm currently working on the data analysis with my brother, Professor Carlos de-Mello-e-Souza, from Seattle University. The purpose of the study is to investigate two main questions:
  • Proximity: How much does proximity (how close you are to the person involved in an ethical dilemma) matter in your ultimate decision? Are you more likely to favor a friend than a stranger?
  • Impartiality: What variables impact the likelihood that we will make an impartial decision? 

As I write the first question, I can already hear my readers' "duh" response.  Of course, you'll say, people are likely to favor their friends.  Next question please.  

Not so fast.  First, the sample will include HR professionals only - we plan to eliminate from the sample participants who do not work in the field of HR.  Most HR professionals will agree that "fairness" is an important value in the profession - you are expected to treat employees impartially and in accordance to organizational policy. For instance, the SHRM Code of Ethics states that HR professionals should "develop, administer, and advocate policies and procedures that foster fair, consistent, and equitable treatment for all." Second, the sample includes a large number of individuals with managerial responsibilities - and managers are also expected to be fair and equitable in the allocation of resources and application of organizational policies (we will be reviewing the data to see the impact of managerial role). Third, the dilemma proposed in the survey was a professional one. It did not involve outside friends, family, etc.  One might expect "fairness" to be a more important motivation in the world of work than in one's social interactions.

The second question, however, is undoubtedly the most interesting one.  Clearly, not everyone is likely to favor the friend.  We are exploring variables such as personality traits, gender, and managerial status as we review the data. 

Before I see the final results, though, I'm spending some time reflecting on the limits of impartiality.  Yes, we advocate for it.  We insist that we are capable of it.  When push comes to shove, however, how impartial are we really? For instance:
  • You are a professor.  The rules say that students have to submit papers by day x. You know, however, that you could change those rules, and that no one will fault you for doing so as long as you do it for everyone (in other words, if you push a date, you will push it for the entire class).  Question is: Who would be most likely to convince you to push down a date? 
  • You are a manager.  All employees must deliver project x by deadline y.  The day before deadline, you see one of the employees in trouble.  She asks you for help just as you're headed home.  Let's assume that you would help any employee under those circumstances.  However, for whom would you stay behind the longest? To whom would you demonstrate the best attitude? 
  • You are a student. The course is over and you're asked to fill out an evaluation. You know the course had some flaws. For the sake of future classes, you want to be honest. How tactful, however, are you likely to be if you like the professor a lot? Might you be harsher under certain circumstances?

In other words: When we think of "impartiality" we often think of big and clear decisions. The true test of impartiality, however, could lie in the little ones.  These little decisions, however, might matter.  They might make a difference between someone's success or failure. 

What do you think? Can you bring examples of moments in which you favor those you love in the little things? What is the impact of your own partiality? What solutions might you offer?
2 Comments
Caryn Lee link
4/13/2014 11:59:09 pm

I think this is a very good question and I think you are right about the small decisions. I think there is always going to be a slight chance of an advantage given to those that you believe may deserve an advantage or are nicer or more appreciative, etc. It is the basis of networking that we are talking about. Maybe in a different circumstance, but the reasoning is the same. If I have an affinity for you, I am more likely to do something for you, i.e. to be impartial.

Reply
TS Massage England link
1/27/2021 10:00:34 pm

Thank you for taking the time to write this post

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    About the Author

    Dr. Cris Wildermuth is an Assistant Professor at Drake University, where she coordinates and teaches at the Master of Science in Leadership Development.

    A
    re you interested in receiving "Connections," our monthly newsletter? If so, please sign up by clicking here. Our promise to you: We never share your information with anyone else.

    Click here more issues of Dr. Wildermuth's blog (we used to publish it in a different address).

    Archives

    December 2020
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    November 2014
    October 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014

    Categories

    All
    Authenticity
    Courage
    Creativity
    Csikszentmihalyi
    Dan McAdams
    Engagement
    Ethics
    Fairness
    Flow
    Gender And Leadership
    Hrci
    Impartiality
    Innovation
    Justice
    Leadership
    Life Stories
    Maleficent
    Personality
    Proximity
    Sheryl Sandberg
    Shrm

    RSS Feed

Home

WHAT WE DO

RESOURCES

BLOG

Contact

Copyright © 2020 The Effectiveness Group